Перепелка

Перепёлка.org.ua

О ферме ~ Купить оборудование ~ Разведение ~ Инкубаторий ~ Бизнес ~ Мастерская ~ Поиск по сайту

Поиск по сайту



COTURNISM: Poisoning by European Migratory Quail


Old World migratory quail (Coturnix) are classified by territorial range into three subspecies. The European C. coturnix coturnix, common to Europe, North Africa, and western Asia, has been reported toxic while both Asian C. coturnix japonica and African C. coturnix africana subspecies have not been, heretofore, identified as poisonous. This essay examines the antiquity of coturnism or human food poisoning by migratory quail, its symptoms, contemporary distribution, and possible etiologies, and concludes with suggestions for research on this ancient, curious dietary problem.


EUROPEAN MIGRATORY QUAIL: DISTRIBUTION, HABITAT, AND MIGRATION

The European migratory quail (Fig. 1) is a Palaearctic species distributed from Arctic Europe southward to equatorial Africa. It possesses a west—east range from the Atlantic islands near Africa through Pakistan, northern India, and the central Soviet Union (Bannerman, 1953; Mackworth-Praed and Grant, 1957; Dement’ev et al., 1967; Etchecopar and Hue, 1967). Within this broad area quail maintain habitat from sea level to above 2500 m, preferring agricultural fields, grasslands, and other protective vegetation offering a diet of mixed seeds, ground-dwelling insects, and small invertebrates (Voous, 1960; Reese and Reese, 1962).
 

European migratory quail (Cotumix cotumix cotumix)
FIGURE 1. European migratory quail (Cotumix cotumix cotumix)


In preparation for migration quail gain nearly 50% body weight. Such fat stores result in large, plump quail that are sharply differentiated from representatives at other times. Quail migration northward from equatorial Africa begins in late winter and lasts through spring. Quail breed in European grain fields from late spring through summer, whereupon they return to sub-Saharan Africa between August and October (Lynes, 1909; Moreau, 1951; Bannerman, 1953). While their migration pattern is complicated and not well understood, quail generally follow one of three major north—south flyways (Fig. 2). The western flyway extends northward across West Africa, the western Sahara, northwest Africa, and western Europe. This route is characterized by a difficult trans-Saharan crossing, but relatively easy passage over the narrow western Mediterranean Sea. The central flyway includes a difficult transSaharan and Mediterranean crossing. Beginning in equatorial central Africa the central route extends northward to western Libya and Tunisia, ultimately reaching west coastal Italy and west-central Europe. The eastern flyway begins in the Great Lake region of East Africa and is characterized by a relatively easy northward flight along the Nile River basin to Egypt, where the flyway splits into eastern and western components. The eastern branch crosses southwest Asia (Israel, Lebanon, Syria, and Turkey) and terminates in the western Soviet Union, while the western branch crosses the Mediterranean at its broadest point and extends across mainland and insular Greece, ultimately reaching eastern Europe.
 

Geographic range and flyway patterns (Coturnix cotumix cotumix)
FIGURE 2. Geographic range and flyway patterns (Coturnix cotumix cotumix)



MIGRATORY QUAIL AND HUMAN POISONING

Coturnism, or food poisoning by migratory quail, while recent in name has been documented for at least 2500, possibly 3500 years. The early date stems from a Biblical account (Numbers, 11:31—34) when Israelite consumption of migratory quail in Sinai during the Exodus resulted in numerous deaths. Whatever the validity of the Biblical account, coturnism certainly was known to ancient Greek and Roman naturalists, physicians, and theologians, among them Aristotle (On Plants, 820:6—7), Didymus (Geoponics, 14:24), Lucretius (On the Nature of Things, 4:639—640), Philo (The Special Laws, 4:120—131), Galen (De Temperamentis, 3:4), and Sextus Empiricus (Outlines of Pyrrhonism, 1:57).

Central to these Greek and Roman reports is the thesis that migratory quail become toxic after consuming seed from hemlock (Conium maculatum) or henbane (Hyoscyamus niger). The ancient reports state that quail were not affected adversely by the seed but could transmit plant toxins to humans who dined on such birds. Indeed, the Roman Pliny (NaturalHistory, 10:33) revealed that migratory quail were banned as human food in Italy during the 1st century A.D., presumably because of potential toxicity.

Medical-toxicological interest in coturnism continued into the Medieval period as evidenced by writings of prominent Islamic and Jewish scientists, among them Ibn Sina (The Canon, 2:2:2:5), Moses ben Maimon (Comment. Epidemiarum, 6:5), Qazwiny (Kitab Aga’il, 2:250), and al-Demiry (Hayat al-Hay- awan, 1:505). Such Islamic and Jewish accounts focused on the relationships between quail diet, the plants aconite (Aconitum napellus) and hellebore (Veratrum spp.), and subsequent human poisoning.

Nineteenth and twentieth century writers, among them Cornevin (1887), Lewin (1898), and Grieve (1931), suggested that quail are insensitive to hemlock. More recent authors, however, have challenged the thesis that coturnism is due to hemlock by suggesting that quail become poisonous after consuming insects with elevated levels of Aristolochic acid (Rotschild, 1970), or after eating seeds from cyanogenic species (Tullis, 1977). Work by Kennedy and the present author (Kennedy, 1980; Kennedy and Grivetti, 1980; and Grivetti, 1980) has contradicted the hemlock thesis by demonstrating that quail are sensitive to hemlock alkaloids and die after consuming only 0.1 g hemlock seed. Thus, the etiological mechanism(s) for coturnism transmission to humans remain unclear.


COTURNISM: DISTRIBUTION AND SYMPTOMOLOGY

Human poisoning by quail has been reported during the twentieth century from Algeria, France, Greece, and Russia; ancient accounts suggest coturnism in Italy and the northern Sinai peninsula (Kennedy and Grivetti, 1980). Reports by scientists and physicians reveal substantial variation in symptoms attributed to coturnism. In Algeria reports include colic, diarrhea, vomiting, fatigue, sensation of heaviness in the lower extremities, impaired speech, and lower limb paralysis (Sergent, 1941). Across the Mediterranean in southern France symptoms associated with quail poisoning include respiratory distress and appearance of red, itchy urticaria (Sergent, 1948). In Russia, in the region between the Black and Caspian Seas, symptoms of coturnism include general weakness in the legs occurring 3—4 hr after consumption, sharp pains extending from the legs upward through the torso into the neck lasting 2—12 hr, followed by generalized pain and weakness continuing for 3-10 days (Khovanskii, 1954, 1957, 1964).

Coturnism is described in detail from the Greek island of Mytelene. There, symptoms have included anuresis, myoglobinuria, sharp muscular pains along the trunk and extremities graduating to paralysis in muscles recently used, oliguric to anuric urinary output, azothemic blood, elevated uric acid levels, elevated SGOT levels (Serum Glutamic Oxaloacetic Transaminase), respiratory distress, and death (Hadjigeorge, 1952; Ouzounellis, 1968a, 1968b, 1970). Demographic evaluation of coturnism cases from Mytelene reveals a greater propensity for poisoning among active, adult males than among females (Ouzounellis, personal communication, 1970). Unpublished accounts document coturnism on the Greek mainland, specifically at Marathon northeast of Athens (Ouzounellis, personal communication, 1970).


COTURNISM: CONTINUED SEARCH FOR THE TRANSMISSION MECHANISM

It has been widely held from antiquity through the twentieth century that poisoning from migratory quail is due to quail diet, specifically an intake pattern based on hemlock or another toxic alkaloid, perhaps aconite, hellebore, or henbane. First scientific experiments into the mechanism for transmission of coturnism to humans were conducted by Sergent (1941). Quail used in his experiments were healthy, evicerated, thoroughly cooked, and free of pesticide residue (a twentieth century precaution!). Sergent reported that quail in Algeria consumed hemlock (Conium maculatum), hellebore (Hyoscyamus niger), and black morelle (Solanum nigrum) and deduced that the birds became toxic after consuming seeds of these plants. He reportedly fed hemlock to quail but could not produce symptoms typical of hemlock poisoning; such dosed quail were fed to dogs and the canines subsequently exhibited hind-leg paralysis, one of the classical symptoms of hemlock poisoning. Sergent concluded that quail were insensitive to hemlock and that quail flesh would transmit hemlock toxins to animals.

Experiments on migratory quail (Asian subspecies available as an experimental animal) by Kennedy and Grivetti (1980) could not reproduce Sergent’s findings and demonstrated that hemlock ingested by quail at the quantity of 1.3—0.1 g daily produced classical symptoms of hemlock poisoning and death. Additional experiments demonstrated that quail, if provided a choice, would not select hemlock as food. Other experiments reported that hemlock ingested by quail in quantities of less than 0.1 g daily would produce a significant appetite depressant effect.

Among the questions to be resolved, therefore is, do migratory quail consume hemlock under free-ranging conditions? Despite ancient nineteenth and twentieth century accounts suggesting hemlock as a regular component of migratory quail diet, proof must lie in botanical examination of seeds found in quail crops. While numerous accounts suggest that quail consume, even thrive on hemlock, this species has not been repeatedly identified by botanists/ ornithologists as a component of quail nutriture (see Cheesman and Sclater, 1935; Uljanin, 1941; Witherby et al., 1949; Keve et al., 1953; Heim de Balsac and Mayaud, 1962; Dement’ev et al., 1967; von Blotzheim, 1973; and Bateman, 1977). The only twentieth century account reporting hemlock in quail crops is Sergent (1941) and a close reading of his text suggests that the identification was made by hunters, not botanists.

More significant, however, is the finding that ingestion of hemlock by quail produces an appetite depressant effect (Kennedy, 1980). Given the supposition that quail might consume hemlock, to do so during the premigratory stage when body weight must be nearly doubled would be counter-productive. Since quail are toxic during the migratory period and since the difficult transSaharan and trans-Mediterranean flights necessitate increased fat stores, one must logically exclude hemlock as the mechanism for transmission of coturnism.

A further argument against hemlock is based on seasonality and timing of the quail migration. In North Africa quail migrate and reach Algeria primarily between April and June, yet hemlock does not drop seeds until late summer and fall. Consequently, before hemlock is available for quail consumption the quail flocks have already crossed the Mediterranean to Europe. When quail return to Algeria from France during the fall, hemlock seed is available yet the birds are not toxic at this time.

Another major question for consideration is why are not all quail toxic, or phrased a different way, why are there not more reported cases of co- turnism? It is apparent that coturnism is only recently receiving epidemiological and medical attention in detail. Ouzounellis is surely correct when he suggests that the incidence of coturnism is underreported. But given underreporting, other nagging questions remain. Why should quail be toxic on the northward flight to Algeria, but not the southern? Why are males more susceptible than females to coturnism? Could such a pattern be due to cultural traditions of serving quail primarily to men as returning hunters, or could coturnism have a genetic basis?

Given the wide range of symptoms identified with quail poisoning, is coturnism a single or multiple disease? Do different symptoms reflect differences in quail diet at the local level? Does the absence or presence of coturnism, after correlation with quail migration direction, support a dietary basis for the disease, or might flight stress in one direction and ease on the return flight suggest production of a metabolite that elicits coturnism in sensitive individuals or populations?

Thus, it becomes important to clearly document each instance of coturnism to permit evaluation of both dietary and metabolite hypotheses. If quail diet is central to understanding coturnism, logic holds that the dietary elements investigated be lipophyllic, produce no effect on quail, but cause poisoning in humans. In this light, the report by Rotschild (1970) that migratory quail are insensitive to aristolochic acid—a compound common to certain insects on which quail dine—should receive experimental attention. If quail physiology and migration stress underlies coturnism, one would expect outbreaks along the flyway stress localities, especially among hunters who capture birds, dispatch them quickly, and consume them within a few hours.

In addition to clearly documenting instances of coturnism, data should be gathered on patient demography, exercise activities prior to onset of symptoms, time and seasonality of the attack, and cultural information on methods used to obtain quail. Penning or cooping wild birds would permit physiological recovery and excretion of potentially toxic metabolites. Finally, data should be collected on cooking and preservation techniques to clearly differentiate between coturnism in the strict sense and poisoning resulting from unsanitary food preparation.


SUMMARY

Coturnism is ancient, traceable certainly to the Greeks and Romans, possibly earlier. Human poisoning by quail has been reported during the twentieth century from Algeria, France, Greece, and Russia; ancient accounts suggest coturnism in Italy and northern Sinai. Multiple symptoms exhibited locally by humans consuming toxic quail suggest that coturnism may have multiple origins founded in local quail diet or in the production of a metabolite during stress of migration. Such hypotheses, however, remain unconfirmed and the mechanism of transmission to humans remains unclear.

Present knowledge of coturnism, its distribution and its history, permits an additional conclusion to be drawn. Based on contemporary data of quail migration direction, flyway patterns, and seasonality of flight, the Biblical account of quail poisoning in Sinai may reflect an actual event. If so, Israelites of the Exodus would have been poisoned by quail during the months of August-October and the Israelite encampment mentioned in Numbers (11:31—34) would have been adjacent to the Mediterranean coast. The disease now called coturnism thus provides support for Biblical scholars who have argued against tradition for a northern Exodus route in contrast with the more widely held southern, tortuous passage.

Louis E. Grivetti, Department of Nutrition, University of California, Davis, California, USA


REFERENCES

al-Demiry [Kamal ed-Din Mohammad Ibn Moussa], 1957, Hayat al-Hayawan al Kubra, 3rd ed., Mustafa al-Baby al-Halaby, Cairo.
Aristotle, 1955, On Plants, translated by W. S. Hett, William Heinemann, London.
Bannerman, D. A., 1953, The Birds of West and Equatorial Africa, 2 Vols., Oliverand Boyd, London.
Bateman, J. B., 1977, Acute Rhabdomyolysis from Eating Quail, Report No. R-8-77 (Aug. 12, 1977), Office of Naval Research, London.
Cheesman, R. E., and Sclater, W. L., 1935, On a collection of birds from northwestern Abyssinia, Ibis 5(series 13):151-191.
Cornevin, C., 1887, Des Plantes Reneneuses et des Empoisonnements qui Elies Determinent, Firmin Didot, Paris.
Dement’ev, G. P., Gladkov, N. A., Isakov, Y. A., Kartashev, N. N., Kirikov, S. V., Mikheev, A. V., and Ptushenko, E. S., 1967, Birds of the Soviet Union, translated by A. Birron and Z. S. Cole, Israel Program for Scientific Translations, Jerusalem.
Didymus, 1805—1806, Agricultural Pursuits (Geoponics), 2 Vols., translated by T. Owens, W. Spils- bury, London.
Etch&zopar, R. D., and Hile, F., 1967, The Birds of North Africa from the Canary Islands to the Red Sea, translated by P. A. D. Hollom, Oliver and Boyd, London.
Galenus [Galen], 1527, Galenide. Temperamentis Liberties, Latin translation by Thomas Linacro, no publisher, London.
Grieve, M., 1931, A Modem Herbal, Butler and Tanner, London.
Grivetti, L. E., 1980, Poisoning by Coturnix quail: Continued search for a toxic mechanism, Program Abstract No. 4, Fourth Annual Meeting West Coast Nutritional Anthropologists, University of California, Davis Campus, May 3, 1980.
Hadjigeorge, E., 1952, Les Cailles empoisinneuses, Presse Med. 68:1469.
Heim de Balsac, H., and Mayaud, N., 1962, Les Oiseaux du Nord-Ouest de l'Afrique, Paul Lechevalier, Paris.
Holy Bible, 1953, King James Edition, Collin’s Clear Type Press, London.
Ibn Sina [Avicenna], 1930, A Treatise on the Canon of Medicine of Avicenna Incorporating a Translation of the First Book, translated by O. C. Gruner, Luzac and Company, London.
Kennedy, B. W., 1980, Coturnix Quail, Poison Hemlock, and the Exodus: A Toxicological Inquiry of an Historical Problem, Unpublished M.Sc. Thesis, Department of Avian Science, University of California, Davis.
Kennedy, B. W., and Grivetti, L. E., 1980, Toxic quail: A cultural—ecological investigation of coturnism, Ecol. Food Nutr. 9:15-42.
Keve, A., Zsak, Z., and Kascab, Z, 1953, A Furj Gazdasagi Jelentosege [The agricultural significance of the quail], Budapest Magyar Nemzeti Museum-Annales Historico-Naturales 4:197—209.
Khovanskii, D. V., 1954 [Concerning quail meat poisoning], in: [Papers of the First Stavropol Physicians' Conference], pp. 65-70, Stavropol.
Khovanskii, D. V., 1957 [On food poisoning caused by quail meat], Okhota I Okhotniche 7:26.
Khovanskii, D. V., 1964 [Quail meat poisoning], in: [Problems in Geographical Pathology], pp. 172—174, Moscow.
Lewin, L., 1898, Lehrbuch der Toxikologie f?r Arzte, Studirende, und Apotheker, Urban and Schwarzenberg, Leipzig.
Lucretius, 1910, On the Nature of Things, translated by C. Bailey, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Lynes, H., 1909, Observations on the migration of birds in the Mediterranean, Br. Birds 3:99—104, 133-150.
Mackworth-Praed, C. W., and Grant, C. H. B., 1957, Birds of Eastern and North Eastern Africa, African Handbook of Birds, Ser. 1, Vol. 1, 2nd ed., Longmans, Green and Co., London.
Moreau, R. E., 1951, The British status of quail and some problems of its biology, Br. Birds 44:257-276.
Moses ben Maim?n [Maimonides], 1970—1971, The Medical Aphorisms of Moses Maimonides, Studies in Judaica Series, translated and Edited by F. Rosner and S. Munter, 2 Vols. (combined), Yeshiva Universtiy Press, New York.
Ouzounellis, T. L, 1968a, Myoglobinuries par ingestion de cailles, Presse Med. 76:1863—1864.
Ouzounellis, T. L, 1968b, Myosphairinouria apo Ortaki, latrike 14:213—217.
Ouzounellis, T. L, 1970, Some notes on quail poisoning, J. Am. Med. Assoc. 211:1186—1187.
Philo, 1954, The Special Laws, translated by F. H. Colson, Vol. 8, William Heinemann, London.
Pliny, 1942, Natural History, 10 Vols., translated by H. Rackham and W. H. S. Jones, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Qazwiny [Zakaria ibn Mohammed ibn Mahmoud], 1957, Kitab Aga’il el-Makhlouquat wa Ghara’ib el-Mawgoudat, 2 vols., Mustafa al-Halaby al-Baby Press, Cairo.
Reese, E. P. and Reese, T. W., 1962, The quail, Coturnix coturnix, as a laboratory animal, J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 5:265—270.
Rotschild, M., 1970, Les papillons qui se deguisent, Sei. Vie 127(632).
Sergent, E., 1941, Les cailles empoisonneuses dans la Bible, et en Algerie de nos jours: apercu historique et recherces experimentales, Arch. Inst. Pasteur Alger. 19:161—192.
Sergent, E., 1948, Les cailles empoisonneuses en France, Arch. Inst. Pasteur Alger. 26:249—252.
Sextus Empiricus, 1933, Outlines of Pyrrhonisn, in: The Works of Sextus Empiricus, Vol. 1, translated by R. G. Bury, G. P. Putnam’s Sons, New York.
Tullis, J. L., 1977, Annual discourse. Don’t eat the quail, N. Eng. J. Med. 297:472-475.
Uljanin, N., 1941, [Materials on ecology of the quail in north Kasahstan], Zoologescheskii Mugei Sbornik Trudov [Moscow University] 6:153—166.
von Blotzheim, N. G., 1973, Handbuch der Vogel Mitteleuropas, Vol. 5, Galliformes und Gruiformes, Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft, Frankfurt am Main.
Voous, K. H., 1960, Atlas of European Birds, Nelson and Sons, Amsterdam.
Witherby, H. F., Jourdain, F. C. R., Ticehurst, N. F., and Tucker, B. W., 1949, The Handbook of British Birds, Vol. 5, H. F. and G. Witherby, London.
 


Перепелиные яйца




Статья была Вам интересна? Подпишитесь на рассылку “Перепёлка.org.ua - новости перепеловодства” и Вы всегда будете в курсе инноваций в мире перепелов. Подписаться >>


оборудование для разведения перепелов



Вы можете высказать своё мнение по данному материалу или задать вопрос. Администратор сайта ежедневно просматривает комментарии и отвечает на вопросы.


Данную страницу никто не комментировал. Вы можете стать первым.

Ваше имя:
Ваша почта:

Комментарий:




Приглашаем Вас на Youtube-канал «Новости и хитрости перепеловодства», где можно посмотреть видео по различным вопросам содержания перепелов, репортажи с перепелиных ферм, интервью с перепеловодами стран СНГ.

Случайное видео с канала: